LubelskivsChallenger
Lubelski (aroma) and Challenger (dual purpose) serve different purposes. Comparing acids, aromas and character helps pick the right hop.
Lubelski
Alpha acid
3–5%
Beta acid
2.5–4%
Total oil
0.5–1.2 mL
Poland
Challenger
Alpha acid
6.5–9%
Beta acid
3–4.5%
Total oil
1–1.7 mL
United Kingdom
Key differences
When to pick Lubelski
- Aroma-focused - ideal for dry hopping
When to pick Challenger
- Higher alpha acid - stronger bittering
- More essential oils - more intense aroma
- More myrcene - pronounced citrus and resinous notes
- Versatile - works for both bittering and aroma
Aroma profile and use
No shared aromas - the varieties have divergent profiles.
Only in Lubelski
SpicyFloralMagnoliaLavender
Only in Challenger
CedarGreenFruity
Property
| Property | Lubelski | Challenger |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha acid | 3–5% | 6.5–9% |
| Beta acid | 2.5–4% | 3–4.5% |
| Co-humulone | 22–28% | 20–25% |
| Total oil | 0.5–1.2 mL | 1–1.7 mL |
| Myrcene | 22–35% | 30–42% |
| Humulene | 30–40% | 24–26% |
| Caryophyllene | 6–11% | 9–10% |
| Farnesene | 10–14% | 0–1% |
| Origin | Poland | United Kingdom |
| Purpose | Aroma | Dual purpose |
Stirling