HBC 586vsMount Hood
HBC 586 (dual purpose) and Mount Hood (aroma) serve different purposes. Comparing acids, aromas and character helps pick the right hop.
HBC 586
Alpha acid
18–22%
Beta acid
11–14%
Total oil
2.5–4.5 mL
United States
Mount Hood
Alpha acid
3.9–8%
Beta acid
5–8%
Total oil
1.2–1.7 mL
United States
Key differences
When to pick HBC 586
- Higher alpha acid - stronger bittering
- More essential oils - more intense aroma
- Higher beta acid - smoother, longer-lasting bitterness
- More myrcene - pronounced citrus and resinous notes
- Versatile - works for both bittering and aroma
- Richer, more complex aroma profile
When to pick Mount Hood
- Aroma-focused - ideal for dry hopping
Aroma profile and use
Shared aromas
HerbalSpicy
Only in HBC 586
MangoLycheeCitrusGuava
Only in Mount Hood
NoblePungent
Property
| Property | HBC 586 | Mount Hood |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha acid | 18–22% | 3.9–8% |
| Beta acid | 11–14% | 5–8% |
| Co-humulone | 35–40% | 21–23% |
| Total oil | 2.5–4.5 mL | 1.2–1.7 mL |
| Myrcene | 55–65% | 30–40% |
| Humulene | 8–12% | 12–38% |
| Caryophyllene | 8–10% | 7–16% |
| Farnesene | 0–1% | 0–1% |
| Origin | United States | United States |
| Purpose | Dual purpose | Aroma |
Hersbrucker