Tardif de BourgognevsLubelski
Tardif de Bourgogne and Lubelski are popular aroma hops. Below you'll find a comparison of alpha and beta acids, aroma profiles and oil composition.
Tardif de Bourgogne
Alpha acid
2.2–5.3%
Beta acid
3.1–5.8%
Total oil
0.4–0.9 mL
France
Lubelski
Alpha acid
3–5%
Beta acid
2.5–4%
Total oil
0.5–1.2 mL
Poland
Key differences
When to pick Tardif de Bourgogne
- Higher beta acid - smoother, longer-lasting bitterness
- Richer, more complex aroma profile
When to pick Lubelski
No clear differences - both varieties have a similar profile. Choose based on availability or country of origin.
Aroma profile and use
Shared aromas
FloralLavender
Only in Tardif de Bourgogne
RedberryGreenNobleIncensePineRose
Only in Lubelski
SpicyMagnolia
Property
| Property | Tardif de Bourgogne | Lubelski |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha acid | 2.2–5.3% | 3–5% |
| Beta acid | 3.1–5.8% | 2.5–4% |
| Co-humulone | 20% | 22–28% |
| Total oil | 0.4–0.9 mL | 0.5–1.2 mL |
| Myrcene | - | 22–35% |
| Humulene | - | 30–40% |
| Caryophyllene | - | 6–11% |
| Farnesene | - | 10–14% |
| Origin | France | Poland |
| Purpose | Aroma | Aroma |
Stirling