EnigmavsChallenger
Enigma (aroma) and Challenger (dual purpose) serve different purposes. Comparing acids, aromas and character helps pick the right hop.
Enigma
Alpha acid
13.5–19.4%
Beta acid
4.5–7.1%
Total oil
1.8–3 mL
Australia
Challenger
Alpha acid
6.5–9%
Beta acid
3–4.5%
Total oil
1–1.7 mL
United Kingdom
Key differences
When to pick Enigma
- Higher alpha acid - stronger bittering
- More essential oils - more intense aroma
- Higher beta acid - smoother, longer-lasting bitterness
- Aroma-focused - ideal for dry hopping
- Richer, more complex aroma profile
When to pick Challenger
- More myrcene - pronounced citrus and resinous notes
- Versatile - works for both bittering and aroma
Aroma profile and use
No shared aromas - the varieties have divergent profiles.
Only in Enigma
TropicalBerryStone fruitRaspberryRedcurrantWhite
Only in Challenger
CedarGreenFruity
Property
| Property | Enigma | Challenger |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha acid | 13.5–19.4% | 6.5–9% |
| Beta acid | 4.5–7.1% | 3–4.5% |
| Co-humulone | 37–43% | 20–25% |
| Total oil | 1.8–3 mL | 1–1.7 mL |
| Myrcene | 23–30% | 30–42% |
| Humulene | 12–19% | 24–26% |
| Caryophyllene | 6–8% | 9–10% |
| Farnesene | 9–12% | 0–1% |
| Origin | Australia | United Kingdom |
| Purpose | Aroma | Dual purpose |
Hallertau Blanc
Nelson Sauvin
Northdown