CTZvsMackinac

CTZ (dual purpose) and Mackinac (aroma) serve different purposes. Comparing acids, aromas and character helps pick the right hop.

CTZ

Dual purpose

Alpha acid

14.5–17%

Beta acid

4.5–5.5%

Total oil

2.5–4.5 mL

United States

Mackinac

Aroma

Alpha acid

9–14%

Beta acid

2.8–4%

Total oil

1.5–2.2 mL

United States

Key differences

When to pick CTZ

  • Higher alpha acid - stronger bittering
  • More essential oils - more intense aroma
  • Higher beta acid - smoother, longer-lasting bitterness
  • More myrcene - pronounced citrus and resinous notes
  • Versatile - works for both bittering and aroma

When to pick Mackinac

  • Aroma-focused - ideal for dry hopping

Aroma profile and use

Shared aromas

Black currantCitrus

Only in CTZ

LicoriceCurryCannabisDank

Only in Mackinac

TropicalMelonPapayaSpicyFloral

Property

PropertyCTZMackinac
Alpha acid14.5–17%9–14%
Beta acid4.5–5.5%2.8–4%
Co-humulone28–35%28–35%
Total oil2.5–4.5 mL1.5–2.2 mL
Myrcene45–55%15–17%
Humulene9–14%11–12%
Caryophyllene6–10%4–5%
Farnesene0–1%1–2%
OriginUnited StatesUnited States
PurposeDual purposeAroma

Related comparisons